|
| Re: [PATCH] Deprecate exec_usermodehelper, fix request_module. | Rusty Russell |
| Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface | Rusty Russell |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: GPL and Nvidia | William Lee Irwin III |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Larry McVoy |
| Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Module licence and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL | Rusty Russell |
[New] | | Rusty Russell |
[New] | RE: Kernel module version support. | "Wang, Stanley" |
[New] | [PATCH] alpha update | Richard Henderson |
[New] | [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 1/8 generic | Stephen Rothwell |
| [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 2/8 ppc64 | Stephen Rothwell |
| Re: [PATCH] generic device DMA (dma_pool update) | David Brownell |
[New] | [BENCHMARK] TIO bench result for 2.5.54 (poor performance) | "Aniruddha M Marathe" |
| Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.5.54 -- ohci-dbg.c: 358: In function ... | David Brownell |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Mike Galbraith |
| Re: [PATCH] generic device DMA (dma_pool update) | David Brownell |
| Re: [BENCHMARK] TIO bench result for 2.5.54 (poor performance) | William Lee Irwin III |
[New] | [2.5 patch] convert pcilynx.c to C99 initializers | Adrian Bunk |
| Re: [2.5 patch] convert pcilynx.c to C99 initializers | Ben Collins |
| [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 3/8 sparc64 | Stephen Rothwell |
| [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 4/8 x86_64 | Stephen Rothwell |
| Re: Kernel module version support. | Rusty Russell |
| [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 5/8 ia64 | Stephen Rothwell |
[New] | Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Module licence and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL | Rusty Russell |
| Re: [PATCH] Deprecate exec_usermodehelper, fix request_module. | Brad Hards |
| [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 6/8 s390x | Stephen Rothwell |
| [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 7/8 mips64 | Stephen Rothwell |
[New] | [BENCHMARK] Lmbench results for 2.5.54 | "Aniruddha M Marathe" |
| Re: [PATCH] generic device DMA (dma_pool update) | David Brownell |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Brad Hards |
| [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 8/8 parisc | Stephen Rothwell |
| Re: [2.5.54] OOPS: unable to handle kernel paging request | "Paul Rolland" |
| Re: [PATCH] generic device DMA (dma_pool update) | William Lee Irwin III |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: [2.5.54, PNP, SOUND] compile error | Adrian Bunk |
| Re: [PATCH] Deprecate exec_usermodehelper, fix request_module. | Jeff Garzik |
| Re: [PATCH] Deprecate exec_usermodehelper, fix request_module. | Andrew Morton |
| 2.5.54-mjb1 (scalability / NUMA patchset) | "Martin J. Bligh" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Mark Mielke |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Richard Stallman |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Richard Stallman |
| Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family | "David S. Miller" |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Mark Hahn |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | "David S. Miller" |
| Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface | "David S. Miller" |
[New] | [BENCHMARK]AIM benchmark result for kernel 2.5.54mm2 | "Sowmya Adiga" |
[New] | Re: Kernel module version support. | Rusty Russell |
[New] | [PATCH] extable cleanup | Rusty Russell |
| Re: [PATCH] extable cleanup | "David S. Miller" |
| Re: e1000 not detected in 2.5.53 | Christian Leber |
| Re: export of sys_call_table | (Eric W. Biederman) |
[New] | RE: [2.5.54] OOPS: unable to handle kernel paging request | "Aniruddha M Marathe" |
[New] | Fw: Linux v2.5.54 | "dada1" |
[New] | [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements) | "Aniruddha M Marathe" |
[New] | [BENCHMARK]unixbench result for kernel 2.5.54mm2 | "Sowmya Adiga" |
[New] | [PATCH] RCU - Make barriers SMP-only | Dipankar Sarma |
[New] | [BENCHMARK] TIObench 2.5.54 mm2 | "Aniruddha M Marathe" |
| Re: GPL and Nvidia | Helge Hafting |
| Re: Fw: Linux v2.5.54 | Andrew Morton |
| Re: [2.5.54] OOPS: unable to handle kernel paging request | "Paul Rolland" |
| Re: Linux v2.5.54 | SZALAY Attila |
| Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements) | Andrew Morton |
| Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements) | "David S. Miller" |
| Re: Fw: Linux v2.5.54 | William Lee Irwin III |
[New] | aic7xxx broken in 2.5.53/54 ? | Dipankar Sarma |
| IDE termination (was Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable) | John Bradford |
| Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements) | Andrew Morton |
[New] | [PATCH] barriers in lockfree rtcache | Dipankar Sarma |
| Re: IDE termination (was Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable) | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: [PATCH][CFT] kexec (rewrite) for 2.5.52 | (Eric W. Biederman) |
[New] | odd phenomenon. | Dave Jones |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Rik van Riel |
| Re: odd phenomenon. | William Lee Irwin III |
| Re: odd phenomenon. | ZHAO Wei |
[New] | menuconfig Bug in 2.5.54 | Andrew Walrond |
| Re: Linux v2.5.54 | SZALAY Attila |
| Re: odd phenomenon. | Dave Jones |
| Re: odd phenomenon. | William Lee Irwin III |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | venom@sns ... |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Christoph Hellwig |
[New] | Re: [CHECKER] 24 more buffer overruns in 2.5.48 | "Petr Vandrovec" |
| Re: odd phenomenon. | Dave Jones |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | ZHAO Wei |
| Re: Linux v2.5.54 | Alan Cox |
[New] | ACPI Problem, 2.5.5x | Jules Kongslie |
[New] | SCSI recommends rewrite -- how? | Hugo Mills |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Andrew Walrond |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Marco Monteiro |
[New] | [PATCH] fix 2.5 compiles w/o tcp/ip | Tomas Szepe |
| Re: [PATCH][CFT] kexec (rewrite) for 2.5.52 | Suparna Bhattacharya |
| Re: Linux v2.5.54 | Christoph Hellwig |
[New] | [PATCH] fix 2.5 compiles w/ networking off | Tomas Szepe |
| Re: [PATCH,RFC] fix o(1) handling of threads | Ed Tomlinson |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andrew Walrond |
| Re: RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source ... | "NEURONET" |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | venom@sns ... |
| One-way Gigabit Ethernet TCP performance with Jumbo frames | Robert Olsson |
[New] | [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Maciej Soltysiak |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Jose Celestino |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Helge Hafting |
| Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors | James Morris |
[New] | [PATCH] AGP support for VIA P4X333 boards | Bernhard Rosenkraenzer |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | John Alvord |
[New] | | "fretre lewis" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andrew Walrond |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Paul Jakma |
[New] | Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | uaca@alumni ... |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Paul Jakma |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Matthias Schniedermeyer |
[New] | question about pci code | "fretre lewis" |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Bill Davidsen |
| RE: [2.5.54] OOPS: unable to handle kernel paging request | Bill Davidsen |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Anders Gustafsson |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Arjan van de Ven |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Tomas Szepe |
| Re: aic7xxx broken in 2.5.53/54 ? | "Justin T. Gibbs" |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Andrew Walrond |
| Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G | "Justin T. Gibbs" |
| Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors | "BODA Karoly jr." |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Hugo Mills |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Disconnect |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | "Randy.Dunlap" |
[New] | Gigabit/SMP performance problem | "Avery Fay" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Erik Andersen |
| Re: UDMA 133 on a 40 pin cable | Vojtech Pavlik |
| Re: Linux v2.5.54 | "Randy.Dunlap" |
| Re: [PATCH] AGPGART for VIA vt8235, kernel 2.4.21-pre2 | Vojtech Pavlik |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | David Schwartz |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Marco Monteiro |
[New] | [SERIAL] change_speed -> settermios change | Russell King |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | "Randy.Dunlap" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Marco Monteiro |
| Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors | James Morris |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Alvaro Lopes |
[New] | Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Larry McVoy |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | David Schwartz |
[New] | 2.4.21-pre2 stalls out when running unixbench | (Joe Korty) |
| Re: [PATCH] AGPGART for VIA vt8235, kernel 2.4.21-pre2 | Richard Baverstock |
[New] | [PATCH 2.5.54] hermes: serialization fixes | Stephen Evanchik |
| Re: [PATCH] AGPGART for VIA vt8235, kernel 2.4.21-pre2 | Dave Jones |
[New] | PROBLEM: nForce USB Bug! | 0_o Genius o_0 |
[New] | [PATCH] I/O APIC confusion | Hugh Dickins |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: [PATCH 2.5.54] hermes: serialization fixes | Benjamin LaHaise |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Larry McVoy |
| Re: [PATCH 2.5.54] hermes: serialization fixes | Stephen Evanchik |
[New] | | Pablo Allietti |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: [PATCH] AGPGART for VIA vt8235, kernel 2.4.21-pre2 | Dave Jones |
| Re: [PATCH] AGPGART for VIA vt8235, kernel 2.4.21-pre2 | Richard Baverstock |
| Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | "Martin J. Bligh" |
[New] | bug: accessing SCSI-MO drive | Norbert Scheibner |
| Re: [PATCH] AGPGART for VIA vt8235, kernel 2.4.21-pre2 | Richard Baverstock |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Jon Portnoy |
[New] | Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements) | Andi Kleen |
| Re: [PATCH] extable cleanup | Linus Torvalds |
| Re: odd phenomenon. | Robert Love |
| Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors | "BODA Karoly jr." |
[New] | RE: [ACPI] acpi_os_queue_for_execution() | "Grover, Andrew" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Ben Greear |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Mark Mielke |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Mark Mielke |
[New] | [RFC] Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt | Sam Ravnborg |
| Re: 2.4.21-pre2 stalls out when running unixbench | Andrew Morton |
[New] | 2.4.21-pre2+bk: matroxfb compile broken | Meelis Roos |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Bob Taylor |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andrew Walrond |
[New] | 2.4.21-pre2: HID & input dependencies | Meelis Roos |
[New] | Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | "Avery Fay" |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Richard Stallman |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | Richard Stallman |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Richard Stallman |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Richard Stallman |
| Re: 2.4.21-pre2 stalls out when running unixbench | Andrew Morton |
[New] | Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Richard Stallman |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Richard Stallman |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Richard Stallman |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Larry McVoy |
[New] | Re: 2.4.21-pre2+bk: matroxfb compile broken | "Petr Vandrovec" |
[New] | [PATCH 2.5.54] UPDATE hermes: serialization fixes | Stephen Evanchik |
[New] | Dual P4 xeon and linux ethernet bridging | me athome |
[New] | Re: [2.5.54] OOPS: unable to handle kernel paging request | Steven Barnhart |
[New] | Dual P4 xeon and linux ethernet bridging | me athome |
| Gigabit/SMP performance problem | Robert Olsson |
| Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | Arjan van de Ven |
| Re: [unify netdev config 19/22] net.1-sparc | Arnd Bergmann |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Mike Galbraith |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Marco Monteiro |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | Larry McVoy |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Christoph Hellwig |
| Re: [BENCHMARK] Lmbench 2.5.54-mm2 (impressive improvements) | Andrew Morton |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Larry McVoy |
| RE: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | "Scott Robert Ladd" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Disconnect |
| Re: [2.5.54, PNP, SOUND] compile error | "Steven Barnhart" |
| Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | "Martin J. Bligh" |
| Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | Ron cooper |
[New] | Re: NVidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Steven Barnhart |
| Re: [PATCH 2.5 RESEND] bttv-cards.c AUDC_CONFIG_PINNACLE fix | "Steven Barnhart" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | jw schultz |
[New] | Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Steven Barnhart |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Samuel Flory |
| Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | "Martin J. Bligh" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Larry McVoy |
| Re: [2.5.54, PNP, SOUND] compile error | "Steven Barnhart" |
| Re: [PATCH 2.5 RESEND] bttv-cards.c AUDC_CONFIG_PINNACLE fix | "Steven Barnhart" |
[New] | Re: [PATCH] extable cleanup | Manfred Spraul |
| RE: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | "Ranjeet Shetye" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Rik van Riel |
| [Way OT]Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Philip Dodd |
[New] | RE: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | "Shureih, Tariq" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Rik van Riel |
| RE: [Way OT]Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | "Ranjeet Shetye" |
| Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | Andrew Theurer |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | "Dimitrie O. Paun" |
[New] | TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files | "A.D.F." |
[New] | GET_TIMEOUT too small for hotplugging in usb.c (2.4.20) | A E Lawrence |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Andrew Walrond |
[New] | Re: CONFIG_X86_TSC_DISABLE question | uaca@alumni ... |
| Gauntlet Set NOW! | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Rik van Riel |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | (Måns_Rullgård) |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Andrew Walrond |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Samuel Flory |
[New] | Kernel bug in agpgart module! | Jan Schiefer |
[New] | RE: Kernel bug in agpgart module! | "Shureih, Tariq" |
| Re: [unify netdev config 19/22] net.1-sparc | Tomas Szepe |
| Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | William Lee Irwin III |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | "jdow" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Marco Monteiro |
| Re: menuconfig Bug in 2.5.54 | Roman Zippel |
[New] | [OOPS] 2.4.20 PPPoE | Alexandra Walford |
| Re: Gauntlet Set NOW! | Andrew McGregor |
| [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies | Roman Zippel |
[New] | Tracing TCP/IP packets from NIC to TCP | Joshua Stewart |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Lionel Bouton |
[New] | kobject_init() sets kobj->subsys wrong? | Matt_Domsch@Dell ... |
[New] | [BK PATCHES] net driver merges | Jeff Garzik |
[New] | Re: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | Nivedita Singhvi |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Florian Weimer |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Samuel Flory |
[New] | inquiry in scsi_scan.c | Andries.Brouwer@cwi ... |
| RE: [STUPID] Best looking code to transfer to a t-shirt | "Ranjeet Shetye" |
[New] | [PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 23 | george anzinger |
| Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors | James Morris |
| [PATCH 3/3] High-res-timers part 3 (posix to hrposix) take 23 | george anzinger |
| 2.5.54: Re: [PATCH][CFT] kexec (rewrite) for 2.5.52 | Andy Pfiffer |
| Re: make/configuration/dependency bug in 2.4.20 kernel | Adrian Bunk |
| Re: [PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 23 | William Lee Irwin III |
| Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 19 (NOT HIGH RES) | george anzinger |
[New] | [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 23 | george anzinger |
| Re: TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files | "J.A. Magallon" |
| Re: [PATCH ] POSIX clocks & timers take 19.1 (NOT HIGH RES) | george anzinger |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | "Shane R. Stixrud" |
[New] | Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | "Billy Rose" |
| Re: menuconfig Bug in 2.5.54 | Andrew Walrond |
| Re: [PATCH 1/3] High-res-timers part 1 (core) take 23 | george anzinger |
| Re: inquiry in scsi_scan.c | Matthew Dharm |
[New] | build failure 2.5.54+ | "James H. Cloos Jr." |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | Mark Mielke |
| Re: 2.4.21-pre2 stalls out when running unixbench | (Joe Korty) |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Alan Cox |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Mark Mielke |
| Re: build failure 2.5.54+ | Andrew McGregor |
[New] | [PATCHSET] New Year's Linux 2.4.21-pre2-jam2 | "J.A. Magallon" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Jeff Garzik |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | "NEURONET" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | David Lang |
| Re: [BK PATCHES] net driver merges | Jeff Garzik |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | David Schwartz |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Larry McVoy |
| Re: [PATCHSET] New Year's Linux 2.4.21-pre2-jam2 | Marc-Christian Petersen |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? | Samuel Flory |
| Re: TCP Zero Copy for mmapped files | dean gaudet |
| Re: [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (1/3) | Michael Hohnbaum |
| Re: inquiry in scsi_scan.c | Patrick Mansfield |
| Re: inquiry in scsi_scan.c | Douglas Gilbert |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | Larry McVoy |
| Re: Linux-2.5.54-sparc64 compile errors | "David S. Miller" |
[New] | [PATCH] 2.5.54 fix ide-cd/ide-scsi oopses after module unload | Mikael Pettersson |
| Re: [PATCH][COMPAT] move struct flock32 3/8 sparc64 | "David S. Miller" |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | "Shane R. Stixrud" |
[New] | Re: inquiry in scsi_scan.c | Andries.Brouwer@cwi ... |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | David Schwartz |
| Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | "Matthew D. Pitts" |
[New] | [PATCH]: 2.5.54: fix oopsable bug in OSS PCI sound drivers | Thomas Sailer |
[New] | RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | <Hell.Surfers@cwctv ... |
[New] | [PATCH]: 2.4.20: fix oopsable bug in OSS PCI sound drivers | Thomas Sailer |
[New] | Re: inquiry in scsi_scan.c | Andries.Brouwer@cwi ... |
| Re: Gigabit/SMP performance problem | Anton Blanchard |
[New] | RE:Gauntlet Set NOW! | <Hell.Surfers@cwctv ... |
| RE:Gauntlet Set NOW! | Andre Hedrick |
[New] | [PATCH] 2.5 INITRD + DEVFS crash | Herbert Xu |
[New] | RE: [Way OT]Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | <Hell.Surfers@cwctv ... |
| Re: [PATCH] 2.5 INITRD + DEVFS crash | Jeff Garzik |
| Re: [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies | Tomas Szepe |
| RE: [Way OT]Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Andre Hedrick |
| Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" | Mark Rutherford |
| Re: [PATCHSET] New Year's Linux 2.4.21-pre2-jam2 | Paul |
| Re: [PATCH] menuconfig support for top-level config menu dependencies | Tomas Szepe |
[New] | RE:Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers? | <Hell.Surfers@cwctv ... |
|