[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux kernel modules development in C++
** Reply to message from Martin Dalecki <> on Thu,
28 Sep 2000 20:31:05 +0200

> Simple: The fact that G++ is constantly changing what it's generatign
> even
> between minor numbers:
> 1. Calling conventions.
> 2. Name mungling.
> 3. Construct semantics.
> 4. Run time support (stdio and STL).
> 5. New features here and there...
> and so on and so on...

Binary compatibility in C++ was NEVER an option, on any platform. The C++
standard specifically excludes any definition for the binary layout of classes
and calling conventions. Anyone who writes "modules" (e.g. DLLs, drivers,
whatever) knows that you can't have cross-module C++ calls. Everything must be
translated to C calls with a standard calling convention (typically the Pascal
calling convention on Windows and OS/2).

Timur Tabi -
Interactive Silicon -

When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just get two copies of the same message.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.201 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site