[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Linux kernel modules development in C++

On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:

> Some arguments why not to use it in the kernel :
> - C++ gives overhead. With something like a kernel that's unwanted.
> - Things like exception handling is hard to do in a kernel.
> - The're a lot more people that know C than C++
> And I probably forgot a few :)

- OO != C++. It's a style of programming and while you can do OO in C++
you can easily do it in other languages (or do non-OO in C++, indeed)
- A _lot_ of the kernel code/design is inherently object-oriented. So
pardon our collective scepticism when YAC++Advocate comes along waving
the "OO ergo C++" underw^Wflag

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:39    [W:0.200 / U:2.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site