lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]  
 
/

13 Jan 1998

 
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Jauder Ho
[New] Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Jauder Ho
[New] module (:George
  Re: module (:Woodstock
[New] Re: disk naming proposal & devfs"Albert D. Cahalan"
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Richard Gooch
  Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Dirty pages in the page cache(Eric W. Biederman)
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Perry Harrington
[New] Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Jauder Ho
  Re: devfsRichard Gooch
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Richard Gooch
[New] sb stereo sound channel reversal in 2.1.x?Scott Lampert
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Jauder Ho
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: devfsKevin Lentin
  Re: devfs patch v4"Matthias Urlichs"
  Re: rand_initialize() -- bug??Henrik Storner
[New] Raw devicesPerry Harrington
  Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Dirty pages in the page cache"Stephen C. Tweedie"
  Re: devfsJauder Ho
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: devfsJauder Ho
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
[New] direct port io.Shane Wegner
[New] [2.0.33] EtherExpress Pro 're-entering handler' LOCKUPTaner Halicioglu
  Re: Raw devicesMatti Aarnio
[New] Re: devfs ketil@ii ...
[New] Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd) ketil@ii ...
[New] FAT filesystem bugs."C. Scott Ananian"
[New] 2.1.79 + fat = FUBARDavid Burrows
[New] tulip.c broken in 2.1.79?Jochen Buehler
[New] Re: devfs"Albert D. Cahalan"
[New] [2.1.79] unregister_proc_table messages.Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
[New] [2.1.7{8,9}] modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
  Re: [Feature Wish] GGI in Linux 2.3Geert Uytterhoeven
  Re: devfs patch v3Steffen Grunewald
[New] Re: devfs"C. Scott Ananian"
  Re: devfs initial permissionsRobert Bihlmeyer
  Re: devfsTethys
  Re: devfs patch v4(Alan Cox)
  Re: devfsRichard Gooch
[New] TLI Interface on Linux? <Markus.Pikart@UNCTAD ...
  SCSI naming scheme: I've almost decidedRichard Gooch
  Re: devfsRichard Gooch
[New] 2.1.79+fat=failed compile <wingman@lcc ...
[New] Patch for driver/char/apm_bios.cRichard Gooch
  Re: [2.1.7{8,9}] modprobe: can't locate module ppp-compress-21Trevor Johnson
[New] Are IP addresses where the last byte is 255 invalid?Baldur Norddahl
  Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Dirty pages in the page cache(Eric W. Biederman)
[New] net_bh OOPS in 2.0.33MacGyver
  Re: SCSI naming scheme: I've almost decidedPavel Machek
  Re: devfs patch v3Gabriel Paubert
  Re: rand_initialize() -- bug??Matthew Kirkwood
  Re: devfslinux kernel account
[New] Re: SOCK_PACKET again.."Sergei Viznyuk"
[New] Re: SOCK_PACKET again.."Sergei Viznyuk"
[New] kernel 2.1.79 compile problemsTodd Roy
  Re: devfs(Joseph H. Buehler)
  Re: [2.1.79] unregister_proc_table messages.Bill Hawes
  Re: devfslinux kernel account
[New] FAT patch for 2.1.79"Todd R. Eigenschink"
  Re: devfs patch v3John Looney
  Re: [2.1.79] unregister_proc_table messages.Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
[New] [PATCH] fat compile problems in 2.1.79Emmanuel Galanos
  Re: 2.0.31 legacy 386 compatibility?Pavel Machek
  Re: devfsTethys
  Re: [PATCH] Upgradeable read locks for USB"Iñaky Pérez González"
[New] [2.1.79] Patch to make FAT compile.Myrdraal
[New] Please tell me what is happeningThomas Pornin
  Re: patch for 2.1.78 knfsdBill Hawes
[New] Re: devfs patch v3"Albert D. Cahalan"
[New] [PATCH] 2.1.79: (v)fat & sbJani Hakala
[New] Offtopic: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd) ketil@ii ...
  Re: module (:George
  Re: devfsBob Tracy
  Re: kernel 2.1.79 compile problemsGordon Chaffee
[New] 2.1.79 successDavid Burrows
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfsDan Taylor
[New] Re: Are IP addresses where the last byte is 255 invalid?DAVID BALAZIC
  Re: Are IP addresses where the last byte is 255 invalid?root
  Re: SOCK_PACKET again..(Alan Cox)
[New] {free|clear}_page_tablesJakub Jelinek
  Re: SCSI naming scheme: I've almost decidedMOLNAR Ingo
  Re: devfsPerry Harrington
[New] 2.1.79 + PCMCIA 2.9.13Jason Flynn
[New] CONFIG_SMPGerald Britton
[New] 2.1.79 / ide-proc.cBob Lorenzini
[New] skpush bug?Blu3Viper
  Re: devfsJauder Ho
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  [PATCH] Re: 2.1.79 + fat = FUBARBernhard Rosenkraenzer
[New] Re: sb stereo sound channel reversal in 2.1.x?Michael Elizabeth Chastain
  Re: devfsMichael Neuffer
[New] portmap diesNeal Becker
[New] >= 2.1.77 fails to boot"Lars Holmberg"
[New] Are IP addresses where the last byte is 255 invalid?Baldur Norddahl
  Re: SCSI naming scheme: I've almost decidedErik Andersen
  Re: devfsDan Hollis
[New] Problem with tulip.c in 2.1.79Timothy Murphy
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: 2.1.78-1 nfs-root problems and patchMartin Mares
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: devfsJauder Ho
[New] Re: [Feature Wish] GGI in Linux 2.3Jason McMullan
[New] Re: Using >1GB RAM"Albert D. Cahalan"
  Re: devfsroot
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: devfsRichard Gooch
  Re: Using >1GB RAMMOLNAR Ingo
[New] FAT fs patch for 2.1.79"C. Scott Ananian"
[New] Re: SCSI naming scheme: I've almost decided"Albert D. Cahalan"
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)Richard Gooch
  Re: Using >1GB RAM"Albert D. Cahalan"
[New] LARGE MEMleak with /dev/zero, 2.1.78Elmer Joandi
  Re: devfs"Adam D. Bradley"
[New] VFAT patch for 2.1.79"C. Scott Ananian"
  Re: Using >1GB RAMXintian Wu
  Re: 2.1.78 MCA fails boot w/ ESDI, initrd (RAM disk) & floppyBrad Allen
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)"Theodore Y. Ts'o"
  Re: Using >1GB RAMXintian Wu
[New] strange messages in system log in 2.1.79 (modprobe: can't locate ...)Mark Orr
[New] Teeny, tiny patch to 1.79, & smbfs question"John R. Corey"
  Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Dirty pages in the page cache"Stephen C. Tweedie"
  Re: devfsMichael Neuffer
[New] Re: devfs(Joseph H. Buehler)
[New] Problem with net/ipv4/ipconfig.cRichard Gooch
  Re: Using >1GB RAM(Alan Cox)
  Re: LARGE MEMleak with /dev/zero, 2.1.78(Alan Cox)
  Re: Using >1GB RAM(Alan Cox)
  Re: Using >1GB RAMMOLNAR Ingo
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)(Joseph H. Buehler)
[New] Code freeze?! Heh.Chris Evans
[New] 2.1.79 fails compile -- ide requires CONFIG_PCIPete Clements
  Re: devfsMitch Adair
  Re: 2.1.79 pre-1 failed compilation...(Alan Cox)
[New] New teardrop attacks: linux ok??Chris Evans
[New] devfs patch v5Richard Gooch
[New] Re: CONFIG_SMPMichael Elizabeth Chastain
[New] 2.1.x config options??Chris Evans
[New] Re: 2.1.79 / ide-proc.c (+ other 2.1.79 fixes)Christian Groessler
  Re: LARGE MEMleak with /dev/zero, 2.1.78Regis Duchesne
[New] Naughties (maybe security?) with /procChris Evans
[New] Minor /proc inconsistencyChris Evans
[New] Oops in 2.1.78"Ruslan V. Brushkoff"
  Re: skpush bug?(Alan Cox)
  Re: Using >1GB RAMJakub Jelinek
  Re: [Feature Wish] GGI in Linux 2.3Brian Gerst
[New] Re: devfs"Grant R. Guenther"
[New] [2.1.79] shaper compilation errorScott Lampert
  Re: LARGE MEMleak with /dev/zero, 2.1.78Andi Kleen
[New] 2.1.79: netlink_post() undefinedMichael Lausch
  RE: 2.0.33 locks + aic7xxx warning messageDoug Ledford
[New] Some warnings in 2.1.79"Ruslan V. Brushkoff"
  Re: 2.1.79 successBenjamin LaHaise
[New] 2.1.79 binfmt-aout module warnings kwrohrer@enteract ...
[New] devfs: multiple names for devicesRobert Bihlmeyer
[New] Questions about /proc/, black magic, Squid and sendmail."Bjarni R. Einarsson"
[New] 2.1.79 still has NFS client problemsMichael Lausch
  Re: Teeny, tiny patch to 1.79, & smbfs questionBill Hawes
[New] fsck fails to detect uncleanly unmounted fs on 2.1.7x"Sergei Viznyuk"
[New] 2.1.79 Wanpipe drivers do not compileChristoph Lameter
  Re: 2.1.79 pre-1 failed compilation..."Krzysztof G. Baranowski"
[New] 2.1.7{8-9}Ildar Khabibrakhmanov
[New] How to diagnose an Oops report?Kirk Bauer
  Re: Please tell me what is happeningJames Mastros
  Re: disk naming proposal & devfs (fwd)linux kernel account
  Re: devfslinux kernel account
  Re: Using >1GB RAMlinux kernel account
  Re: devfsJames Bottomley
  Re: 2.1.79 pre-1 failed compilation...linux kernel account
[New] compiling fat under 2.1.79 as module failsJeffrey Hundstad
  Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Dirty pages in the page cache(Eric W. Biederman)
  Re: dcache questionsGordon Chaffee
  Re: LARGE MEMleak with /dev/zero, 2.1.78Andi Kleen
[New] smbfs & linux 2.1.79 still no go :(David Burrows
  Re: SCSI naming scheme: I've almost decided aem@netcom ...
[New] Fast switching (read help!)root
  Re: Teeny, tiny patch to 1.79, & smbfs questionJohn Corey
  Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
[New] Re: devfs"Leonard N. Zubkoff"
  Re: devfsRichard Gooch
\
 
  \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-10 23:48    [0.154 seconds]
©2004-2010 Jasper Spaans