![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
well if you believe all the numbers floating around the net, linux actually has a bigger user base than solaris. but that's not what' important. Linux DOES need commercial support and like you said, the easier we make it for the vendors to port their stuff over, hopefully they would be more inclined to do so. I wouldn't mind seeing something like a /etc/system file for linux too. --Jauder On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Perry Harrington wrote: > Greetings, I am new to (this) list. I have quite a bit of experience with > Solaris, and I must say that duplicating the Solaris naming scheme to access > SCSI disks/devices is a Good Thing(tm). Getting commercial software vendors > to support Linux is difficult already, creating some non-standard obscure > naming scheme is a step in the wrong direction. It is conceivable that we > could get some commercial vendor (Veritas???) to support Linux when logical > vols are up to snuff, and this would make them happy. I personally think > that the Controller,Target,device?,slice model seems kindof silly, but Solaris > has a market share that's the envy of Linux. > > My $0.02. > > --Perry > HANDLE WITH EXTREME CARE: This Message Contains Minute Electrically Charged Particles Moving at Velocities in Excess of Five Hundred Million Miles Per Hour. | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:41 [W:0.514 / U:0.060 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||