lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce
On Fri 2009-05-08 00:37:39, trekker.dk@centrum.cz wrote:
> Well...
>
> >
> >
> >To summarise disadvantages:
> >
> >- only core has 8000 LoC
> >- it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
> > (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
> >- it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
> >- compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
> >
>
> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
>

Which kernels you tried, what hw it is? Can you do s2ram?
Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-11 14:21    [W:0.130 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site