[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

>>> To summarise disadvantages:
>>> - only core has 8000 LoC
>>> - it does stuff that can be easily done in userspace
>>> (and that todays distros _do_ in userspace).
>>> - it duplicates uswsusp functionality.
>>> - compared to [u]swsusp, it received little testing
>> To summarise advatages - for me tuxonice is the only hibernation method that works.
>> (Till now I've had 3 machines - no one of them able to resume with in-kernel swsusp.)
> Just to add my 2 cents as a user of TOI. Every distro and release I've
> tried has one major issue with kernel hibernation. Upon resume when
> hibernating large images, there's a residual footprint in swap. Every
> further hibernation creates a larger footprint, to the order of an
> additional 5-7% each time. Nobody has ever cared in any forum to
> explain why or how I might change that.

Maybe you should explain why it is a 'major issue'?

(Use swapoff -a; swapon -a to 'cure' it).

(cesky, pictures)

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-11 14:19    [W:0.100 / U:6.996 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site