lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] mmc: omap_hsmmc: correct precedence of operators
Date
With the current code, the condition in the if() doesn't make much sense due to
precedence of operators.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
index bc58078..3ee2664 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_context_restore(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host)
if (host->context_loss == context_loss)
return 1;

- if (!OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSSTATUS) & RESETDONE)
+ if (!(OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSSTATUS) & RESETDONE))
return 1;

if (host->pdata->controller_flags & OMAP_HSMMC_SUPPORTS_DUAL_VOLT) {
--
1.8.0


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-20 22:21    [W:0.284 / U:13.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site