lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] tools, power: correct precedence of operators in init_maxfreq_mode
Date
With the current code, the condition in the if() doesn't make much sense due to
precedence of operators.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
---
tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c
index 5650ab5..90a8c4f 100644
--- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c
+++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/idle_monitor/mperf_monitor.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int init_maxfreq_mode(void)
unsigned long long hwcr;
unsigned long min;

- if (!cpupower_cpu_info.caps & CPUPOWER_CAP_INV_TSC)
+ if (!(cpupower_cpu_info.caps & CPUPOWER_CAP_INV_TSC))
goto use_sysfs;

if (cpupower_cpu_info.vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
--
1.8.0


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-12-20 21:01    [W:0.131 / U:7.976 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site