lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.0.31 : please!y
On Sun, 13 Jul 1997, Alan Cox wrote:

> 2.0.30 should
> IMHO have never occured, it was forced on people by the perpetual whining
> of some folks for 2.1.x features in 2.0.x.

That's the wrong way, IMHO. I believe, 2.0.3x features add-on should be
suspended, and only bugfixes should be included in 2.0.31. I believe.

> Alan


Egor Egorov, ComputerWorld/Kiev, egor@fastware.kiev.ua
Nothing in this message relates in any way with ComputerWorld/Kiev or IDG.

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GMC/FA/CS dx s+:- a? C+++ UBLC*++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o+ K? w--- O!
!M V? PS! PE! Y? PGP++@ t@ 5@ X@ R++@ tv++@ b+++ DI? D++() G !e h* r? z?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.157 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site