Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Jul 1997 11:30:43 +0300 (EET DST) | From | Egor Egorov <> | Subject | Re: 2.0.31 : please!y |
| |
On Sun, 13 Jul 1997, Alan Cox wrote:
> 2.0.30 should > IMHO have never occured, it was forced on people by the perpetual whining > of some folks for 2.1.x features in 2.0.x.
That's the wrong way, IMHO. I believe, 2.0.3x features add-on should be suspended, and only bugfixes should be included in 2.0.31. I believe.
> Alan
Egor Egorov, ComputerWorld/Kiev, egor@fastware.kiev.ua Nothing in this message relates in any way with ComputerWorld/Kiev or IDG.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GMC/FA/CS dx s+:- a? C+++ UBLC*++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o+ K? w--- O! !M V? PS! PE! Y? PGP++@ t@ 5@ X@ R++@ tv++@ b+++ DI? D++() G !e h* r? z? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
| |