lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.0.31 : please!
On Sun, 13 Jul 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Seriously - it appears that a critical mass of developers has decided
> that a stable, working kernel isn't worth the bother. I find this
> highly troubling. Anybody want to bet that 2.2 will be left in a fairly
> unusable state too, while the developers start out on 2.4?

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

There are a number of problems that need to be sorted out before the next
patch. You don't want 2.0.31 to be _less_ stable than 2.0.30 do you?

-Dan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean