lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4.4 017/266] powerpc/rfi-flush: Move the logic to avoid a redo into the debugfs code
Date
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

commit 1e2a9fc7496955faacbbed49461d611b704a7505 upstream.

rfi_flush_enable() includes a check to see if we're already
enabled (or disabled), and in that case does nothing.

But that means calling setup_rfi_flush() a 2nd time doesn't actually
work, which is a bit confusing.

Move that check into the debugfs code, where it really belongs.

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
@@ -873,9 +873,6 @@ static void do_nothing(void *unused)

void rfi_flush_enable(bool enable)
{
- if (rfi_flush == enable)
- return;
-
if (enable) {
do_rfi_flush_fixups(enabled_flush_types);
on_each_cpu(do_nothing, NULL, 1);
@@ -929,13 +926,19 @@ void __init setup_rfi_flush(enum l1d_flu
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
static int rfi_flush_set(void *data, u64 val)
{
+ bool enable;
+
if (val == 1)
- rfi_flush_enable(true);
+ enable = true;
else if (val == 0)
- rfi_flush_enable(false);
+ enable = false;
else
return -EINVAL;

+ /* Only do anything if we're changing state */
+ if (enable != rfi_flush)
+ rfi_flush_enable(enable);
+
return 0;
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-15 14:18    [W:0.570 / U:15.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site