lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2024]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 01/16] x86/mce: Define mce_setup() helpers for common and per-CPU fields
From


On 4/16/24 06:02, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 10:13:44AM -0500, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>> index b5cc557cfc37..7a857b33f515 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
>> @@ -117,20 +117,32 @@ static struct irq_work mce_irq_work;
>> */
>> BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(x86_mce_decoder_chain);
>>
>> -/* Do initial initialization of a struct mce */
>> -void mce_setup(struct mce *m)
>> +void mce_setup_common(struct mce *m)
>
> Since we're touching this...
>
> mce_setup() is a perfectly wrong name for what it does. So let's clean
> it up. Diff ontop below.
>
> * mce_prep_record() - the name says what the function does.
>
> * mce_prep_record_per_cpu() - "per_cpu" as this is a common kernel
> concept and we do use per_cpu data in there.
>
> Please do this in two patches:
>
> - the first one renames mce_setup() only without adding the additional
> functionality
>
> - the second one does the split
>
> Thx.
>

Okay, will do.

Should I send another revision of this entire set? Or should I split out
the mce_setup() patches?

Thanks,
Yazen

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2024-04-17 15:51    [W:0.372 / U:0.424 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site