lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Subject[patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
    From
    Date
    Containers:

    Commodity HW is becoming more powerful. This is giving opportunity to
    run different workloads on the same platform for better HW resource
    utilization. To run different workloads efficiently on the same
    platform, it is critical that we have a notion of limits for each
    workload in Linux kernel. Current cpuset feature in Linux kernel
    provides grouping of CPU and memory support to some extent (for NUMA
    machines).

    For example, a user can run a batch job like backup inside containers.
    This job if run unconstrained could step over most of the memory present
    in system thus impacting other workloads running on the system at that
    time. But when the same job is run inside containers then the backup
    job is run within container limits.

    We use the term container to indicate a structure against which we track
    and charge utilization of system resources like memory, tasks etc for a
    workload. Containers will allow system admins to customize the
    underlying platform for different applications based on their
    performance and HW resource utilization needs. Containers contain
    enough infrastructure to allow optimal resource utilization without
    bogging down rest of the kernel. A system admin should be able to
    create, manage and free containers easily.

    At the same time, changes in kernel are minimized so as this support can
    be easily integrated with mainline kernel.

    The user interface for containers is through configfs. Appropriate file
    system privileges are required to do operations on each container.
    Currently implemented container resources are automatically visible to
    user space through /configfs/container/<container_name> after a
    container is created.

    Signed-off-by: Rohit Seth <rohitseth@google.com>

    Diffstat for the patch set (against linux-2.6.18-rc6-mm2_:

    Documentation/containers.txt | 65 ++++
    fs/inode.c | 3
    include/linux/container.h | 167 ++++++++++
    include/linux/fs.h | 5
    include/linux/mm_inline.h | 4
    include/linux/mm_types.h | 4
    include/linux/sched.h | 6
    init/Kconfig | 8
    kernel/Makefile | 1
    kernel/container_configfs.c | 440 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    kernel/exit.c | 2
    kernel/fork.c | 9
    mm/Makefile | 2
    mm/container.c | 658 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    mm/container_mm.c | 512 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    mm/filemap.c | 4
    mm/page_alloc.c | 3
    mm/rmap.c | 8
    mm/swap.c | 1
    mm/vmscan.c | 1
    20 files changed, 1902 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

    Changes from version 1:
    Fixed the Documentation error
    Fixed the corruption in container task list
    Added the support for showing all the tasks belonging to a container
    through showtask attribute
    moved the Kconfig changes to init directory (from mm)
    Fixed the bug of unregistering container subsystem if we are not able to
    create workqueue
    Better support for handling limits for file pages. This now includes
    support for flushing and invalidating page cache pages.
    Minor other changes.

    *****************************************************************
    This patch set has basic container support that includes:

    - Create a container using mkdir command in configfs

    - Free a container using rmdir command

    - Dynamically adjust memory and task limits for container.

    - Add/Remove a task to container (given a pid)

    - Files are currently added as part of open from a task that already
    belongs to a container.

    - Keep track of active, anonymous, mapped and pagecache usage of
    container memory

    - Does not allow more than task_limit number of tasks to be created in
    the container.

    - Over the limit memory handler is called when number of pages (anon +
    pagecache) exceed the limit. It is also called when number of active
    pages exceed the page limit. Currently, this memory handler scans the
    mappings and tasks belonging to container (file and anonymous) and tries
    to deactivate pages. If the number of page cache pages is also high
    then it also invalidate mappings. The thought behind this scheme is, it
    is okay for containers to go over limit as long they run in degraded
    manner when they are over their limit. Also, if there is any memory
    pressure then pages belonging to over the limit container(s) become
    prime candidates for kernel reclaimer. Container mutex is also held
    during the time this handler is working its way through to prevent any
    further addition of resources (like tasks or mappings) to this
    container. Though it also blocks removal of same resources from the
    container for the same time. It is possible that over the limit page
    handler takes lot of time if memory pressure on a container is
    continuously very high. The limits, like how long a task should
    schedule out when it hits memory limit, is also on the lower side at
    present (particularly when it is memory hogger). But should be easy to
    change if need be.

    - Indicate the number of times the page limit and task limit is hit

    - Indicate the tasks (pids) belonging to container.

    Below is a one line description for patches that will follow:

    [patch01]: Documentation on how to use containers
    (Documentation/container.txt)

    [patch02]: Changes in the generic part of kernel code

    [patch03]: Container's interface with configfs

    [patch04]: Core container support

    [patch05]: Over the limit memory handler.

    TODO:

    - some code(like container_add_task) in mm/container.c should go
    elsewhere.
    - Support adding/removing a file name to container through configfs
    - /proc/pid/container to show the container id (or name)
    - More testing for memory controller. Currently it is possible that
    limits are exceeded. See if a call to reclaim can be easily integrated.
    - Kernel memory tracking (based on patches from BC)
    - Limit on user locked memory
    - Huge memory support
    - Stress testing with containers
    - One shot view of all containers
    - CKRM folks are interested in seeing all processes belonging to a
    container. Add the attribute show_tasks to container.
    - Add logic so that the sum of limits are not exceeding appropriate
    system requirements.
    - Extend it with other controllers (CPU and Disk I/O)
    - Add flags bits for supporting different actions (like in some cases
    provide a hard memory limit and in some cases it could be soft).
    - Capability to kill processes for the extreme cases.
    ...

    This is based on lot of discussions over last month or so. I hope this
    patch set is something that we can agree and more support can be added
    on top of this. Please provide feedback and add other extensions that
    are useful in the TODO list.

    Thanks,
    -rohit




    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-20 04:19    [W:0.054 / U:3.376 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site