lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 03:00 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > (this time to the lists as well)
    >
    > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    >
    > > I'd much rather containterize the whole reclaim code, which should not
    > > be too hard since he already adds a container pointer to struct page.
    >
    >

    Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in
    such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first
    operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But
    in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code.

    > > I still have to reread what Rohit does for file backed pages, that gave
    > > my head a spin.

    Please let me know if there is any specific part that isn't making much
    sense.

    -rohit


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-20 19:53    [W:0.021 / U:88.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site