lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 20 Sep 2006 10:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
FromChristoph Lameter <>
SubjectRe: [patch00/05]: Containers(V2)- Introduction
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Alan Cox wrote:

> Ar Mer, 2006-09-20 am 09:25 -0700, ysgrifennodd Christoph Lameter:
> > We already have such a functionality in the kernel its called a cpuset. A 
> > container could be created simply by creating a fake node that then 
> > allows constraining applications to this node. We already track the 
> > types of pages per node. The statistics you want are already existing. 
> > See /proc/zoneinfo and /sys/devices/system/node/node*/*.
> 
> CPUsets don't appear to scale to large numbers of containers (say 5000,
> with 200-500 doing stuff at a time). They also don't appear to do any
> tracking of kernel side resource objects, which is critical to
> containment. Indeed for some of us the CPU management and user memory
> management angle is mostly uninteresting.

The scalability issues can certainly be managed. See the discussions on 
linux-mm. Kernel side resource objects? slab pages? Those are tracked.

> I'm also not clear how you handle shared pages correctly under the fake
> node system, can you perhaps explain that further how this works for say
> a single apache/php/glibc shared page set across 5000 containers each a
> web site.

Cpusets can share nodes. I am not sure what the problem would be? Paul may 
be able to give you more details.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-20 19:19    [from the cache]
©2003-2008