![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 10:52 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote: > > > Right now the memory handler in this container subsystem is written in > > such a way that when existing kernel reclaimer kicks in, it will first > > operate on those (container with pages over the limit) pages first. But > > in general I like the notion of containerizing the whole reclaim code. > > Which comes naturally with cpusets. How are shared mappings dealt with, are pages charged to the set that first faults them in? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-09-20 20:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||