Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:31:03 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... |
| |
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 12:40:11AM -0400, Skip Ford wrote: > That's only 1 aspect. The frustrating part is bug reports mailed to the > list getting a response of "oh, that's fixed in the latest bk tree." > > That's happened a dozen times in the last week...no wonder non-bk users > feel out of the loop. I've been staring at the code for a lot of years > and it's finally just starting to make sense to me, now by the time I see > it the core hackers have moved on to something else. > > Daily snapshots would be great.
We have hourly snapshots, thanks to the work David Woodhouse and Rik van Riel did at a moments notice. Does this satisfy your concerns above?
I have a suspicion that the problem of conflicting obvious fixes won't go away.
There's another interesting twist here... - I didn't see any of them on linux-kernel.
<joke> I'm a BK user! GNU patches are being submitted behind my back without discussion on linux-kernel. I'm going to remove the SubmittingPatches document! It's harming discussion of patches on linux-kernel. </joke>
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |