Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre... | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:57:38 +0200 |
| |
On Sunday 21 April 2002 06:20, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Ian Molton <spyro@armlinux.org> > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:31:43 +0100 > > Alexander Viro Awoke this dragon, who will now respond: > > > As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of > > patches since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell > > whether it hurts orSure, except no-one cares about this point. > > Sure, except no-one cares about this point. > > the documentation is the 'sticky wicket'... > > Incorrect. The argument for the documentation was that it along with > other things wrt. BK create some "barrier to entry" for Linux kernel > development and almost force someone to use BK.
It was my argument, so I'm qualified to say what it was. Ian Molton is correct, your interpretation is strictly secondary.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |