Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Apr 2002 03:57:59 +0100 | From | Ian Molton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree |
| |
Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's > contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club.
I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall.
He said that having proprietary stuff in the kernel was a bad idea.
We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any different? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |