![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:05:27 -0400 (EDT) Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> wrote: > As one of the guys who doesn't use BK _and_ had submitted a lot of patches > since Linus had started using it, I'm probably qualified to tell whether it > hurts or not, right? Well, it doesn't. So far the only difference was > in the quality (and latency) of changelogs and that was definitely welcome. "me too". Actually, I found it easier to get the Trivial patches in, and about the same for per-cpu and futex patches. I don't bk. When patches didn't go in, it's more due to Mingo Theorum[1] than being non-bk. And that's a Good Thing for calibrating my coding tastes upwards. Rusty. [1] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201291324560.3610-100000@localhost.localdomain> -- there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:22 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||