[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subject[STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
    This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe)

    We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one
    directory, then delete it in order.

    Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't
    evaluated because it will take long long time ...

    both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was
    data=writeback to be somewhat fair ...

    real user sys
    Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s
    Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s

    Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s
    Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s

    htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd
    to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ...

    Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr /// (icq)23200764 /// (http)
    When you're invisible, the only one really watching you is you (my keychain)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.024 / U:41.936 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site