lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
    Andreas Dilger wrote:

    >
    >
    > It looks like
    >reiserfs is nearly CPU-bound by the tests, so it is unlikely that they
    >can run much faster.
    >
    Um, usually being CPU bound is easier to fix. We have probably not CPU
    profiled this code path, and after Halloween we probably should (but for
    reiser4, since reiser3 is soon to be obsoleted). It is being IO bound
    that is usually hard to fix, though since I haven't read the htree code
    I trust you that it is different in this case....

    >In theory, ext3+htree run at the CPU time if we
    >fixed the allocation and/or seeking issues.
    >
    >Cheers, Andreas
    >--
    >Andreas Dilger
    >http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
    >http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
    >
    >-
    >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    >
    >
    >
    >



    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.022 / U:150.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site