lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
Hans Reiser wrote:

> Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
>
>> This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe)
>>
>> We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one
>> directory, then delete it in order.
>>
>> Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't
>> evaluated because it will take long long time ...
>>
>> both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was
>> data=writeback to be somewhat fair ...
>>
>> real user sys
>> reiserfs:
>> Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s
>> Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s
>>
>> Ext3:
>> Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s
>> Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s
>>
>> htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd
>> to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ...
>>
>>
>>
> Can you send us the code so we can try it on reiser4? We are going to
> release reiser4 sometime this month (don't ask me when), and we'd be
> happy to see you run it when you do.

^you^we

Sorry to list for bandwidth waste.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.193 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site