lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
    Hans Reiser wrote:

    > Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
    >
    >> This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe)
    >>
    >> We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one
    >> directory, then delete it in order.
    >>
    >> Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't
    >> evaluated because it will take long long time ...
    >>
    >> both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was
    >> data=writeback to be somewhat fair ...
    >>
    >> real user sys
    >> reiserfs:
    >> Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s
    >> Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s
    >>
    >> Ext3:
    >> Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s
    >> Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s
    >>
    >> htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd
    >> to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ...
    >>
    >>
    >>
    > Can you send us the code so we can try it on reiser4? We are going to
    > release reiser4 sometime this month (don't ask me when), and we'd be
    > happy to see you run it when you do.

    ^you^we

    Sorry to list for bandwidth waste.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.024 / U:120.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site