Messages in this thread | | | From | Nikita Danilov <> | Date | Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:39:48 +0400 | Subject | Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 |
| |
Paul P Komkoff Jr writes: > This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe) > > We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one > directory, then delete it in order. > > Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't > evaluated because it will take long long time ... > > both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was > data=writeback to be somewhat fair ... > > real user sys > reiserfs: > Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s > Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s > > Ext3: > Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s > Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s
Why user times are so different?
> > htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd > to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ... > > -- > Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr /// (icq)23200764 /// (http)stingr.net > When you're invisible, the only one really watching you is you (my keychain)
Nikita.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |