Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:39:08 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 22/31] perf tools: Add BPF_PROLOGUE config options for further patches |
| |
Em Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 04:21:56AM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu: > If both LIBBPF and DWARF are detected, it is possible to create prologue > for eBPF programs to help them accessing kernel data. HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE > and CONFIG_BPF_PROLOGUE is added as flags for this feature. > > PERF_HAVE_ARCH_GET_REG_OFFSET indicates an architecture supports > converting name of a register to its offset in 'struct pt_regs'. > Without this support, BPF_PROLOGUE should be turned off. > > Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> > Cc: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> > Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> > Cc: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com> > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> > Cc: pi3orama@163.com > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/1436445342-1402-33-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com > --- > tools/perf/config/Makefile | 12 ++++++++++++ > tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile > index 38a4144..d46765b7 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile > +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile > @@ -314,6 +314,18 @@ ifndef NO_LIBELF > CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT > $(call detected,CONFIG_LIBBPF) > endif > + > + ifndef NO_DWARF > + ifneq ($(origin PERF_HAVE_ARCH_GET_REG_INFO), undefined) > + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE > + $(call detected,CONFIG_BPF_PROLOGUE) > + else > + msg := $(warning BPF prologue is not supported by architecture $(ARCH));
Shouldn't this be replace to something like:
msg := $(warning BPF prologue is not supported by architecture $(ARCH), missing ARCH_GET_REG_INFO);
Or even in lowercase?
> + endif > + else > + msg := $(warning DWARF support is off, BPF prologue is disabled); > + endif > + > endif # NO_LIBBPF > endif # NO_LIBELF > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h b/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h > index 8f14965..3dda083 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/include/dwarf-regs.h > @@ -5,4 +5,11 @@ > const char *get_arch_regstr(unsigned int n); > #endif
Shouldn't this test against PERF_HAVE_ARCH_GET_REG_INFO instead? I.e. is arch_get_reg_info() only allowed to work with eBPF? I guess not, right? > +#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE > +/* > + * Arch should support fetching the offset of a register in pt_regs > + * by its name. > + */ > +int arch_get_reg_info(const char *name, int *offset); > +#endif > #endif > -- > 2.1.0
| |