| Date | Wed, 8 Sep 2010 19:28:35 +0800 | From | Wu Fengguang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() |
| |
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 06:47:28PM +0800, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
|