Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:15:47 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() |
| |
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:04:48 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:47:28 +0100 > Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote: > > > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > > > With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim > > pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of > > trylock_page() in this case. > > > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> > > Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> > Ah......but can't this change cause dead lock ??
Thanks, -Kame
| |