lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 05/10] vmscan: Synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page()
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> With synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to reclaim
> pages even if page is locked. This patch uses lock_page() instead of
> trylock_page() in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>

> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 5979850..79bd812 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -665,7 +665,9 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> page = lru_to_page(page_list);
> list_del(&page->lru);
>
> - if (!trylock_page(page))
> + if (sync_writeback == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC)
> + lock_page(page);
> + else if (!trylock_page(page))
> goto keep;
>
> VM_BUG_ON(PageActive(page));


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-09-08 08:19    [W:0.280 / U:16.604 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site