[lkml]   [2010]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
Subject[PATCH] [196/223] wmi: use memcmp instead of strncmp to compare GUIDs
2.6.35-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <>

commit 8b14d7b22c61f17ccb869e0047d9df6dd9f50a9f upstream.

While looking for the duplicates in /sys/class/wmi/, I couldn't find
them. The code that looks for duplicates uses strncmp in a binary GUID,
which may contain zero bytes. The right function is memcmp, which is
also used in another section of wmi code.

It was finding 49142400-C6A3-40FA-BADB-8A2652834100 as a duplicate of
39142400-C6A3-40FA-BADB-8A2652834100. Since the first byte is the fourth
printed, they were found as equal by strncmp.

Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <>

drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
--- linux.orig/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
+++ linux/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ static bool guid_already_parsed(const ch
wblock = list_entry(p, struct wmi_block, list);
gblock = &wblock->gblock;

- if (strncmp(gblock->guid, guid_string, 16) == 0)
+ if (memcmp(gblock->guid, guid_string, 16) == 0)
return true;
return false;

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-12-13 00:57    [W:0.422 / U:4.652 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site