lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
From
Date
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:25:12 PST, v j said:
> > It's written in black and white, in the license.
>
> Please point me to where it says I cannot load proprietary modules in
> the Kernel.

Nobody can point you there, because it doesn't say that anywhere.

What you do to *your* kernel is *your* business.

The question is what the code you *distribute* to *other* people does. It's
perfectly legal to load proprietary modules into the kernel. The open question
is whether you're allowed to ship a proprietary module to somebody else.

And that will depend in *great* detail on *exactly* what your module does,
what code it uses, and how it does it. As others have pointed out, NVidia
and ATI think they're in an OK spot with the way *they* do *their* module,
while many embedded companies, shipping a much different product, have almost
unanimously given in rather than risk a court fight about the GPL.

Of course, most companies will cave in and license rather than fight a
patent troll as well - so you *really* need to discuss *your* case with
a clueful lawyer.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-16 10:55    [W:0.236 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site