lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
    On 2/16/07, v j <vj.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
    > > It's written in black and white, in the license.
    >
    > Please point me to where it says I cannot load proprietary modules in
    > the Kernel.
    >
    > > Apart from that,
    > > Greg KH has made his opinion clear, and you have said you understand
    > > and don't debate that he holds this opinion, and his code is what you
    > > said you were linking to (the sysfs/class stuff), so why do you keep
    > > saying that "it is not clear".
    >
    > I know his opinion. I don't debate his opinion. It is his code. I
    > choose not to use his code because of the license issue.
    >
    > > Do you think that, somehow, Linus' opinion trumps Greg KH's opinion on
    > > his own code?
    >
    > No, just that the trend is disturbing. If enough Kernel Developers
    > choose to write their Software in a way that prevents others from
    > using it freely, then that is troubling. Especially when these Kernel

    Isn't there a big difference between "use GPL code" and "modify GPL
    code, link closed modules to it & redistribute everything as
    binaries"?

    --
    Miguel Ojeda
    http://maxextreme.googlepages.com/index.htm
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-02-16 07:43    [W:0.027 / U:1.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site