[lkml]   [2007]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: GPL vs non-GPL device drivers
On 2/16/07, v j <> wrote:
> > It's written in black and white, in the license.
> Please point me to where it says I cannot load proprietary modules in
> the Kernel.
> > Apart from that,
> > Greg KH has made his opinion clear, and you have said you understand
> > and don't debate that he holds this opinion, and his code is what you
> > said you were linking to (the sysfs/class stuff), so why do you keep
> > saying that "it is not clear".
> I know his opinion. I don't debate his opinion. It is his code. I
> choose not to use his code because of the license issue.
> > Do you think that, somehow, Linus' opinion trumps Greg KH's opinion on
> > his own code?
> No, just that the trend is disturbing. If enough Kernel Developers
> choose to write their Software in a way that prevents others from
> using it freely, then that is troubling. Especially when these Kernel

Isn't there a big difference between "use GPL code" and "modify GPL
code, link closed modules to it & redistribute everything as

Miguel Ojeda
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-02-16 07:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean