[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: notion of a local address [was: Re: ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19]
    On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 11:58:11AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
    > Andrey Savochkin:
    > > Of course, SIOCGIFCONF isn't even close to provide the list of local
    > > addresses.
    > > Obvious example: it doesn't enlist all addresses, etc.
    > > on common systems. If you handle as local, you apply side
    > is not local on any of my systems. The only exceptions
    > are some Linux boxen that I did not ask to do so.
    > I welcome suggestions, maybe even code fragments, that will allow
    > an MTA to correctly recognize user@[ip.address] as local, as required
    > by the SMTP RFC.

    The question was which ip.address in user@[ip.address] should be treated as
    My comment was that the only reasonable solution on Linux is to treat this
    way addresses explicitly specified in the configuration file.
    Postfix may show its guess at the installation time.

    Now the question of recognizing user@[ip.address] as local is a question of a
    simple table lookup.

    Best regards
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.021 / U:0.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site