lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: notion of a local address [was: Re: ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias bug 2.4.9 and 2.2.19]
Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> wrote:
>
> An SMTP MTA is required to correctly recognize user@[ip.address]
> as local. That's the rules, like it or not. These address forms
> are actually being used, like it or not.

Yes. MTAs have to work around this; qmail does a reasonable job. Why
not look at how djb does this? See ipme.c.

> It also is desirable for an MTA to treat clients on local subnets
> different than strangers that happen to be on the same class A,
> like it or not. Failure to do so can make one end up on black
> lists, like it or not.

Having an MTA automatically treat clients on "local subnets" differently
than the rest of the 'net at large is definitely _not_ desirable. The
administrator should have to explicitly configure the MTA to grant
additional access to every subnet he desires; anything else is begging
for trouble in the form of absued relaying privileges.

Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <linux@discworld.dyndns.org>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [W:0.160 / U:6.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site