Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: notion of a local address [was: Re: ioctl SIOCGIFNETMASK: ip alias | Date | Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:45:50 -0400 (EDT) | From | (Wietse Venema) |
| |
Alan Cox: > > 127.0.0.2 is not local on any of my systems. The only exceptions > > are some Linux boxen that I did not ask to do so. > > Todays reading is from RFC990 in the book of Reynolds & Postel, page number 6 > > And the IETF spake thusly > > | The class A network number 127 is assigned the "loopback" function, that > | is, a datagram sent by a higher level protocol to a network 127 address > | should loop back inside the host. No datagram "sent" to a network 127 > | address should ever appear on any network anywhere.
That's routing.
I was talking about accepting connections. None of my systems accepts connections on 127.0.0.2, except for a couple Linux boxen that I did not ask to do so.
Wietse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |