[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Binary files in the kernel sources? (Michael Rothwell)  wrote on 21.08.00 in <>:

> "Mike A. Harris" wrote:
> > My guess is the only reason for logo.gif is that nobody has
> > bothered to notice it or care. Anyone care to convert it and
> > submit a png? Sending a diff of a png wouldn't be a good idea I
> > don't think. ;O)
> Could be that .gif is a simpler format,
> and therefore more suitable for in-kernel use.

Could, but is not. GIF and PNG have approximately the same functionality,
with mostly these differences IIRC:

* GIF has thumbnail and animation support
* PNG is much better thought out and has a far more regular structure
* PNG has *far* better documentation (RFC 2083, for starters).

If anything, I'd say PNG is simpler.

MfG Kai
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.084 / U:21.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site