Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:38:18 +0000 (GMT) | From | Tigran Aivazian <> | Subject | Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4) |
| |
On 21 Jan 2000, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Wrong again, it makes the code less readable because kzalloc() is a > non standard function name. This looks more to me like a patch just > for the sake of the patch.
kzalloc() may sound a bit funny, correct, but if the standard kmem_alloc() under Linux sounds like kmalloc() then kmem_zalloc() should sound like kzalloc(), should it not?
Oh well, I don't care - this was a trivial patch that achieved a trivial goal at a trivial expense, but we have more important issues to deal with...
Tigran
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |