[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4)
    On 21 Jan 2000, Jes Sorensen wrote:
    > Wrong again, it makes the code less readable because kzalloc() is a
    > non standard function name. This looks more to me like a patch just
    > for the sake of the patch.

    kzalloc() may sound a bit funny, correct, but if the standard kmem_alloc()
    under Linux sounds like kmalloc() then kmem_zalloc() should sound like
    kzalloc(), should it not?

    Oh well, I don't care - this was a trivial patch that achieved a trivial
    goal at a trivial expense, but we have more important issues to deal


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.042 / U:19.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site