[lkml]   [2000]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4)
    On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 02:46:37AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > Wrong again, it makes the code less readable because kzalloc() is a
    > > non standard function name. This looks more to me like a patch just
    > > for the sake of the patch.
    > Since when has "kmalloc" been a standard name anyway ?

    Why do we have printk anyway? It serves the same purpose as printf and
    is even tagged as `taking arguments like printf' for gcc's type-checking
    benefit. It makes it harder to take large chunks of code and move it
    to userspace for testing (ok, i can #define printk printf, but still).
    Just Hysterical Raisins?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.035 / U:0.112 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site