Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 23 Jan 2000 03:23:07 -0600 | From | Bill Wendling <> | Subject | Re: [patch-2.3.40-pre6] kzalloc() (ala kmem_zalloc() of SVR4) |
| |
Also sprach Matthew Wilcox: } Why do we have printk anyway? It serves the same purpose as printf and } is even tagged as `taking arguments like printf' for gcc's type-checking } benefit. It makes it harder to take large chunks of code and move it } to userspace for testing (ok, i can #define printk printf, but still). } Just Hysterical Raisins? } Are you suggesting using printf instead? Surely you jest. libc is not compiled into the kernel, of course.
Cheers.
-- || Bill Wendling wendling@ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |