Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 27 Oct 1998 13:00:26 +0100 (CET) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Subject | Re: 2.2.0 and egcs 1.1 was Re: Sorry, wrong gcc-version |
| |
On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > BTW. Linus and Alan are utterly wrong in theyr bashing of egcs. The single > one sufficient reason which gratifies the usage of egcs over gcc-2.7.x is: > Actually *usable* and standard adherent C++ support. (However there are
The kernel doesn't contain any single line of C++. scripts/ksymoops.cc is not the kernel.
> some other resons too). Therefore it's really a pitty that one can't use > the stable 2.0.xx with it...
That's why Debian comes with the old gcc, and egcs g++.
Greetings,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~geert/ Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |