lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1996]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc.
On Tue, 11 Jun 1996, Chris Evans wrote:

>
> Re: The CPU quotas...
>
> Max CPU time per process is already supported and has been for a long time.
> See man setrlimit, and note RLIMIT_CPU. This support is in the kernel,
> software support is also needed, and is forthcoming as a config file with
> the Shadow Password Suite.

Good. Half the job is already done. Someone should write a book on the
2.0 kernel, and explain all the sections, and have them indexed by usage,
in multiple volumes! :-) And have a appendix published for each new
upgrade patch. Heheh

>
> Max % cpu time would be a very useful thing to have, and in theory not
> too hard to do. sched.c would have to be modified however and performance
> might drop a little with the extra checks involved.

I really hope it will be done. I would not really mind a small
performance drop, and that is why it would be #ifdef'd and optional in a
make config option.

>
> Other ideas for 2.1:
>
> o Allow user setting of permissions of files within /proc. (I was working
> on this ages ago).

Umm, why? :-)

>
> o Better process accounting.

True.... very much needed.

> o System call auditing (for really security paranoid sites).

I guess you are a "really security paranoid site". :-> Then again, I could
think of a few calls I would want to log. Oh well...

> Chris.
>

Later...

--
Jeff Johnson GCS d- s: !a C+++ UA++(+++) P+ L+
trn@gate.net E---- W+++ N+++(+++++) K- w(+) O(-)
KE4QWX M- V-(--) PS+ PE Y++ PGP+++(+++++) t-
http://www.gate.net/~trn 5 X+++(+++++) R tv+ b++ DI-- D G++ e* !h r y?
Nerdity Test = 66% Hacker Test = 45%
1024/3397E001 1995/06/10 5B 92 8B 34 84 E9 42 26 DC FB F7 C4 1E 0E 80 29



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:37    [W:0.152 / U:3.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site