Messages in this thread |  | | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: 2.0, loggings, cpu quotas, 2.1 issues, etc. | Date | Wed, 12 Jun 1996 09:47:53 +0100 (BST) |
| |
> > Make that a chargeable group and we get the ability to partition a big > > machine up by department and to do sensible charging schemes. For big number > > crunchers that is an issue. > A wonderful idea. Would imposing a memory usage quota be a extrememly > difficult task, Alan?
I can see some semantics issues like who do you charge for a shared page, both, half each, ... (I like half each as it will encourage people to run two of the same job at once as its cheaper on machine resources!)
A;lan
|  |