lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [May]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6
[ Apologies if you're receiving this twice, the previous mailing did not seem 
to make it to the list for some reason ].

Hi all,

Please find attached the latest iteration of bandwidth control (v6).

Where the previous release cleaned up many of the semantics surrounding the
update_curr() path and throttling, this release is focused on cleaning up the
patchset itself. Elements such as the notion of expiring bandwidth from
previous quota periods as well as some of the core accounting changes have
been pushed up (and re-written for clarity) within the patchset reducing the
patch-to-patch churn significantly.

While this restructuring was fairly extensive in terms of the code touched,
there are no major behavioral changes beyond bug fixes.

Thanks to Hidetoshi Seto for identifying the throttle list corruption.

Notable changes:
- Runtime is now actively expired taking advantage of the bounds placed on
sched_clock syncrhonization.
- distribute_cfs_runtime() no longer races with throttles around the period
boundary.
- Major code cleanup

Bug fixes:
- several interactions with active load-balance have been corrected. This was
manifesting previously in throttle_list corruption and crashes.

Interface:
----------
Three new cgroupfs files are exported by the cpu subsystem:
cpu.cfs_period_us : period over which bandwidth is to be regulated
cpu.cfs_quota_us : bandwidth available for consumption per period
cpu.stat : statistics (such as number of throttled periods and
total throttled time)
One important interface change that this introduces (versus the rate limits
proposal) is that the defined bandwidth becomes an absolute quantifier.
Previous postings:
-----------------
v5:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/22/477
v4:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/23/44
v3:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/12/44
v2:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/28/88
Original posting:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/12/393
Prior approaches:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/5/44 ["CFS Hard limits v5"]

Thanks,

- Paul




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-05-07 08:37    [W:0.475 / U:1.324 seconds]
©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site