Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:44:18 +0800 | From | Hu Tao <> | Subject | Re: [patch 00/15] CFS Bandwidth Control V6 |
| |
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:29:49PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > (2011/06/14 15:58), Hu Tao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've run several tests including hackbench, unixbench, massive-intr > > and kernel building. CPU is Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430 @ 2.40GHz, > > 4 cores, and 4G memory. > > > > Most of the time the results differ few, but there are problems: > > > > 1. unixbench: execl throughout has about 5% drop. > > 2. unixbench: process creation has about 5% drop. > > 3. massive-intr: when running 200 processes for 5mins, the number > > of loops each process runs differ more than before cfs-bandwidth-v6. > > > > The results are attached. > > I know the score of unixbench is not so stable that the problem might > be noises ... but the result of massive-intr is interesting. > Could you give a try to find which piece (xx/15) in the series cause > the problems?
OK. I'll do it.
> > Thanks, > H.Seto
| |