[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree

On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 15:00 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > I might add that the intel SAPIC functions
> > in roughly the same manner, so this might break more than just voyager.
> Are you referring to the IA64 SAPIC here, or something else? The only
> mention of SAPIC in the x86 tree appear to be naming of fields in ACPI
> tables.

Yes, that's the one ... but I believe a class of the xAPICs also used a
similar principle.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-04-28 00:13    [W:0.067 / U:7.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site