[lkml]   [2008]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree

    On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 15:00 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > James Bottomley wrote:
    > > I might add that the intel SAPIC functions
    > > in roughly the same manner, so this might break more than just voyager.
    > Are you referring to the IA64 SAPIC here, or something else? The only
    > mention of SAPIC in the x86 tree appear to be naming of fields in ACPI
    > tables.

    Yes, that's the one ... but I believe a class of the xAPICs also used a
    similar principle.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-04-28 00:13    [W:0.019 / U:3.128 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site