| | Date | Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:00:11 -0700 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree |
| |
James Bottomley wrote: > I might add that the intel SAPIC functions > in roughly the same manner, so this might break more than just voyager.
Are you referring to the IA64 SAPIC here, or something else? The only mention of SAPIC in the x86 tree appear to be naming of fields in ACPI tables.
-hpa
|