Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 15 Apr 2007 10:58:25 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] |
| |
* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 15:01 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Well, I'll stop heating the room for now as I get out of ideas about > > how to defeat it. I'm convinced. I'm impatient to read about Mike's > > feedback with his workload which behaves strangely on RSDL. If it > > works OK here, it will be the proof that heuristics should not be > > needed. > > You mean the X + mp3 player + audio visualization test? X+Gforce > visualization have problems getting half of my box in the presence of > two other heavy cpu using tasks. Behavior is _much_ better than > RSDL/SD, but the synchronous nature of X/client seems to be a problem. > > With this scheduler, renicing X/client does cure it, whereas with SD > it did not help one bit. [...]
thanks for testing it! I was quite worried about your setup - two tasks using up 50%/50% of CPU time, pitted against a kernel rebuild workload seems to be a hard workload to get right.
> [...] (I know a trivial way to cure that, and this framework makes > that possible without dorking up fairness as a general policy.)
great! Please send patches so i can add them (once you are happy with the solution) - i think your workload isnt special in any way and could hit other people too.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |