![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 15:01 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Well, I'll stop heating the room for now as I get out of ideas about how > to defeat it. I'm convinced. I'm impatient to read about Mike's feedback > with his workload which behaves strangely on RSDL. If it works OK here, > it will be the proof that heuristics should not be needed. You mean the X + mp3 player + audio visualization test? X+Gforce visualization have problems getting half of my box in the presence of two other heavy cpu using tasks. Behavior is _much_ better than RSDL/SD, but the synchronous nature of X/client seems to be a problem. With this scheduler, renicing X/client does cure it, whereas with SD it did not help one bit. (I know a trivial way to cure that, and this framework makes that possible without dorking up fairness as a general policy.) -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-04-15 09:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||