lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 10 Jun 2002 10:03:09 -0700
FromTom Rini <>
SubjectRe: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 08:59:48AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> >>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>     Paul> This is the problem scenario.  Suppose we are doing DMA to a
>     Paul> buffer B and also independently accessing a variable X which
>     Paul> is not part of B.  Suppose that X and the beginning of B are
>     Paul> both in cache line C.
> 
>     David> I see what the problem is.  Hmmm...
> 
>     David> I'm trying to specify this such that knowledge of
>     David> cachelines and whatnot don't escape the arch specific code,
>     David> ho hum...  Looks like that isn't possible.
> 
> So is the consensus now that in general drivers should make sure any
> buffers passed to pci_map/unmap are aligned to SMP_CACHE_BYTES (and a
> multiple of SMP_CACHE_BYTES in size)?  In other words if a driver uses
> an unaligned buffer it should be fixed unless we can prove (and
> document in a comment :) that it won't cause problems on an arch
> without cache coherency and with a writeback cache.

And how about we don't call it SMP_CACHE_BYTES too?  The processors
where this matters certainly aren't doing SMP...

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:22    [W:0.690 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans