lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:13:48PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:55, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On Sunday 21 April 2002 19:22, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > > > How much less convenient is it to click on a link? So much harder that it's
> > > > > worth pissing off some key developers?
> >
> > > > Linus has already explained why he put it into the kernel sources.
> >
> > > So far the only argument I've seen is: it's convenient. Did I miss something?
> > > The convenience argument is bogus. A url is just as convenient,
> >
> > If you say this, then you either missed, or are willfully ignoring,
> > what Linus said. Search for the string "helsinki.fi".
>
> Linus said:
>
> > As to why the docs are in the kernel sources rather than on any web-sites:
> > it's simply because I don't even _have_ a web page of my own (I've long
> > since forgotten the password to my old helsinki.fi account ;),
>
> Larry has offered to host it, so Linus's argument is answered.

These are docs-about-Linus, not docs-about-Larry.

Do you propose to move SubmittingPatches and all info related to CVS, to
Larry's web site?

If not... (see the last line of Linus's first response in this thread)

Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.131 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site